Pages

Showing posts with label elitism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label elitism. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

Because sometimes the truth isn't good enough

Note: this post was written years ago, and only when I was digging this old blog out of mothballs for posterity's sake did I realize this had been left as a draft.


There's a go-to conclusion many people reach when they hear something they don't agree with, or something that is so diametrically opposed to their point of view that they refuse to even acknowledge the existence of the opposing viewpoint.

"You just don't understand!"

Child-free individuals face this a lot. Of all the topics of conversation that exist out there, raising children is one we're not allowed to have an opinion on. Well, I shouldn't say that. We're allowed to have an opinion, it's just not valid. No matter what the suggestion or comment is, it's dismissed out of hand by many parents because "you don't understand, you don't have kids" or the snarkier "you're clearly not a parent if you're saying THAT". I could be suggesting they let their kid breathe instead of having that plastic bag on their head, and I'd still be wrong.

Why so Serious?

What's the point of summarily attacking a viewpoint without discussion? Why not just debate, explain your own viewpoint, and hope that everyone learns something? A friend of mine recently pointed out that being child-free means I lack perspective on parenting. I don't think I lack perspective, I think I have a different one. I have the luxury of seeing the situation from a distance, more objectively. A parent is bound to take a stance that favours their family; I'd expect no less. On the other hand, I can step back and look at multiple factors: the individual parent, the other parent (where applicable), the siblings, the schooling, the environment in general, the choice of toys or entertainment, etc. and reach a conclusion more dispassionately than someone who might measure their worth as a parent based on the findings. I think it's an extension of The Great Lie, that giving validation to the opinion of an "outsider" somehow besmirches their parenting skills. And so the collective Breeder consciousness shuts us out and we are unable to offer counsel, doomed to always be out of the loop.

A little fight in you. I like that

Debate is healthy. An argument can be productive so long as it's well intended and respectful. But far too often, the responses I've gotten included a scoff or the other party outright laughed right in my face. That's disrespectful and rude. It's entirely possible that I didn't think of a certain aspect, or that my opinion or idea isn't correct. I invite anyone I'm talking to about anything to open a dialog so we can talk about it, so that I can learn. But somehow, if I dare say anything about how anyone raises their child—even the most innocuous of comments—I get ridiculed and ostracized for it. How dare I even think I have anything pertinent to say on the matter? It's not like I would ever comment on politics, or religion, or social trends, or fashion, or the entertainment world or... oh wait.

You'll hunt me. You'll condemn me. Set the dogs on me

Because that's what needs to happen. Because as long as the Breeder elitism reigns and parenting is trendy, they'll need someone to be the bad guy. Someone has to be wrong in order for them to be right. Some will say that this article is hypocrisy, that I'm no better than what I'm denouncing because I'm wantonly "attacking" the other side. I say that I'm encouraging a less adversarial approach and I live for the day when I won't have anything to write about anymore. Until then, I can't just stand here.

Monday, May 27, 2013

Understanding

It's a lovely word, isn't it? It just glows with positivity. To comprehend, absorb knowledge and show an ability to decipher its meaning. In a more emotional context it denotes acceptance, tolerance, even forgiveness. Understanding is, to me, what gives our sentience as human beings its meaning. We can learn and grow from that learning and we can sympathize with others. It's the kindest part of our rational minds.

But is it something that we only acquire upon bearing children? More and more people I encounter seem to think so. You see, I had two other topics bouncing around my head for this post, but both of them came back to one inescapable fact that the childfree face all the time: we don't understand. I'm going to try to wrap my head (and yours) around this problem
.

Knowledge

This is always the first hurdle. Parents and even expectant parents will dismiss the possibility that someone without children has any knowledge about parenting or that they ever could have, and that's just plain wrong. I'm an intelligent person. I'm a psychology enthusiast with peripheral interests in anthropology and sociology. I can talk about studies on advertising targeted to children, nutritional value of processed, pre-packaged lunch foods, even debate the merits of certain educational methods. But to a Breeder, none of that matters. My knowledge is moot, and I have no valid opinion. To them I am simply not a parent, therefore I have no valid opinion.

Perspective

The main argument I get after being dismissed is always the same: it's not just that I don't understand, it's that I can't. Not being a parent simply makes my brain incapable of having the knowledge required to form a cogent argument. And that, my dear friends, is the biggest load of hypocritical bullcrap that the Breeders toss around. It's parenting elitism at its finest, and it's wrong. Somehow, by not having children, I can't have a valid opinion on circumcision or the environmental and economical impacts of cloth vs. disposable diapering. I also can't comment on the economics of raising children without drawing ire from some. I admit that I lack perspective. I don't know firsthand what it's like to have and raise children and I probably never will. But that's one aspect of a far more complex situation. It doesn't invalidate any math, logic, or downright common sense I might have.

Desperation

Naturally, I don't go down without a fight in these arguments. I produce more facts, quote more sources, and deploy more logic. The discussion goes back and forth until, inevitably, the other party scoffs at me or shakes their head saying "you just don't understand". In my experience, that's always been the battle cry of the defeated who won't admit to it. I give them the floor, beg and plead with them to make more arguments and defend their position, but they don't. They walk away, leaving me with an armload of supported arguments that go unacknowledged in the face of their experience which is summarily determined to be superior. It's sad in some ways and incredibly frustrating in others. I don't necessarily want to win, I just want to hear the opposing viewpoint. I want counterpoints other than having my lack off offspring being pointed out to me. I want to understand.

Condescension

I am not a car guy. I don't fix my car when it breaks down, I get a mechanic to do it. Heck until recently, I couldn't even change my own oil. But I can sit down with you and explain how an internal combustion engine works. I understand the principles behind all of it. So if I'm talking to a mechanically inclined person, I can carry on a conversation and we can exchange ideas even if I'm not practiced in his or her field. My knowledge is recognized and an intelligent discourse is established. Not so with parenting. "It's not the same" I hear. This is the aforementioned elitism rearing its ugly head. I don't know if it's a defense mechanism because they feel their way of life is being attacked or if it's because I'm not part of the club; I'm not one of the cool kids doing all the cool parenting things, so I don't get a say. Who knows? I'll probably never get a straight answer.

Methodology

At heart, I'm a scientist. I pick a problem apart, analyze it, experiment with it, and proceed with the most beneficial solution based on the information at hand. That approach can be used with almost all of life's problems. Emotions get in the way, consequences make us second guess ourselves, but the method always remains sound. That's why I'm such a pain in the neck to debate with. I throw out argument after argument, as rooted in logic as I possibly can. I'm a born talker (and, to a certain extent, writer). I can talk my way through just about anything.

But somehow, this never gets me anywhere when I try to have a sensible conversation with a Breeder. I guess I never will understand.